Viral living
So, I was reading Salon yesterday on my lunch break at work and came across a newsbrief there about March Together for Life (be warned the images are gruesome), a pro-life blog. The blogger, Pete, wrote a blog entry about an article in The Onion where a woman wrote about being "totally psyched" about getting an abortion and murdering her baby. Pete didn't realize that the article was, of course, satire. And that it was written in 1999. Within a week, the web has been abuzz about this.
There is even an article about the whole drama on wikipedia.
The comment threads on salon are hilarious. But what does this say about our viral society? We've become a society that spends so much energy living on the net and communicating via email and blogs that people can't recognize satire and sarcasm or even communicate effectively.
The original poster, Pete, may have been searching the internet for articles to back-up his POV, but it is amusing that so much "NEWS" and commentary has been spun out of this. It is so much easier to lash out at people when we don't talk to them face-to-face.
There is even an article about the whole drama on wikipedia.
The comment threads on salon are hilarious. But what does this say about our viral society? We've become a society that spends so much energy living on the net and communicating via email and blogs that people can't recognize satire and sarcasm or even communicate effectively.
The original poster, Pete, may have been searching the internet for articles to back-up his POV, but it is amusing that so much "NEWS" and commentary has been spun out of this. It is so much easier to lash out at people when we don't talk to them face-to-face.


